ABSTRACT
Objectives: Opioids play a significant role in the effective management of cancer-related pain. The COVID-19 lock down may have reduced access to opioids and caused a decline in the use of prescription of opioids among cancer survivors. This study compared opioid prescription rates among cancer survivors before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic using real-world electronic health records (EHR). Method(s): Cohort analyses of cancer patients using data from EHR database from the TriNetX, a global federated health research network across 76 healthcare organizations. We analyzed changes in prescription opioid use before (March 1, 2018, through March 1, 2019) and after onset of COVID-19 (April 01, 2020, through March 2021) among cancer survivors. The key outcome variable was any opioid prescription within 1 year of cancer diagnosis. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to balance the characteristics (age, sex, race, diagnoses including diabetes, hypertensive diseases, overweight, mood disorders, and visual disturbances) of the two cohorts. Data were analyzed using the TriNetX platform. Result(s): There were 1,502,143 cancer survivors before COVID-19 and 1,412,599 cancer survivors after the onset of COVID-19. The one-to-one propensity-score match yielded 1,382,561 cancer patients, mean age 64 at cancer diagnosis, and 73% were white. Percentage of opioid use among cancer patients declined from 35.6% before the COVID-19 to 35.1% after the onset of the pandemic (OR=0.976, 95% CI 0.971-0.981). Average number of opioid prescriptions within 1 year of cancer diagnosis declined from 5.7 before to 5.3 after the COVID-19 onset (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): Among cancer survivors, a small decline in prescription opioid use was observed after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to distinguish the impact of revised guidelines, opioid prescription policy changes, and COVID-19 lock down on lower rates of prescription opioid use among cancer survivors.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary is a low volume centre carrying out approximately 13 oesophagectomies per annum. Due to minimal exposure to post-operative oesophagectomy patients, staff had low perceived confidence in their management within the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). After an initial pause due to the COVID-19 pandemic, oesophagectomy service provision restarted in June 2020. Prior to this project, no standardised care pathway existed for post-operative oesophagectomy patients. A protocol driven management pathway was implemented within the ICU setting in October 2020. Objective(s): 1. Standardise the first 5 days of post-operative care for oesophagectamies 2. Improve 30 day mortality rate 3. Reduce opiate use on step down to High Dependency Unit (HDU) 4. Improve ICU Medical and Nursing staff perceived confidence in the management of oesophagectomy patients. Method(s): A multi-disciplinary approach was taken, with input from ICU, Surgical, Anaesthetic, Physiotherapy, Nursing, Pain and HDU teams. Standards of care for post-operative oesophagectomy patients were identified and a protocol was subsequently produced for use within ICU with reference to current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines.1 The protocol covered the first 5 days of post-operative care. It identified tasks to be completed each day and highlighted which staff group was responsible for performing each task. Additionally, an information sheet was distributed to Medical and Nursing ICU staff to educate them on oesophagectomy patients and recognition of potential complications that arise when caring for this patient group. Data on 30 day mortality and opiate use at step down to HDU was collected from electronic notes. This was collected retrospectively prior to implementation of the protocol from January 2019 - July 2020 and prospectively following its implementation, from October 2020 - December 2021. ICU staff perceived confidence in managing post-operative oesophagectomy patients was measured using a combined quiz and survey. It was completed by staff prior to introduction of the protocol. Following implementation of the protocol and distribution of the information sheet, the quiz and survey was repeated to evaluate improvement in staff confidence. Result(s): A total of 38 oesophagectomy cases were identified. 21 cases were reviewed prior to implementation of the protocol, with 1 mortality at 30 days. 17 cases were reviewed following implementation of the protocol, with 0 mortalities at 30 days. Qualitative scoring showed a 20% increase in staff confidence to manage this patient group. Review of drug prescription charts revealed a reduction in dose of modified release opiates at step down to HDU. Conclusion(s): Oesophagectomy is major surgery and causes significant staff anxiety in low volume centres. This protocol has successfully standardised care for this patient group and allowed continuation of this essential service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol improved 30 day mortality, reduced opiate use at step down to HDU and improved ICU staff perceived confidence in caring for post-operative oseophagectomy patients.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To assess utilization differences in compounded products before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary objectives were to understand if there were changes in patient cost sharing and types of products compounded pre- and post- pandemic. Method(s): A cross-sectional study was completed using a large national claims database for patients who received at least one COVID-related vaccine, test, or treatment from October 2015 to July 2022. Claims included in the analysis are those identified as paid, listed as compounded, and were filled in 2019, 2020, or 2021. Chi-Square and T-Tests were used to determine if there are differences between each year. Result(s): The prevalence of paid claims for compounded products was 0.00055% (14,101) in 2019, 0.00042% (11,551) in 2020, and 0.00048% (14,005) in 2021. In each year, most claims for compounded products were through commercial insurance 70% in 2019, 62% in 2020, and 65% in 2021. On average there were approximately 2 claims per patient. The most frequently compounded product was lidocaine hydrochloride 20mg/ML topical solution. In 2020 there was an increase in utilization of naltrexone hydrochloride, a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Between 2019 and 2020 the number of compounded claims decreased 17.6% while the number of total claims increased by 9.01%. From 2020 to 2021 the number of claims for compounded products returned to pre-pandemic levels with a 21.24% increase. In the same period, the total number of claims increased 5.86%. The average patient cost sharing for compounded products was $42.57 (SD: $60.02) in 2019, $40.07 ($80.36) in 2020, and $42.61 ($60.02) in 2021. Conclusion(s): We found that there were fewer patients receiving compounded products following the COVID-19 pandemic. We found no change in the number of compounded claims for hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, though in 2020, there was a notable increase in the number of claims for naltrexone hydrochloride.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: There is a dearth of information on older users (65+ years) of medical cannabis, who may face unique challenges due to altered metabolism with aging, concurrent medication use, and risk of adverse effects. This observational study aimed to describe a large cohort of older medical cannabis users in Canada. Method(s): From Oct 2014 to Oct 2020, a commercial medical cannabis provider based in Canada collected anonymized data for research purposes from patient volunteers. Data included demographic, social, and health details (at intake) and cannabis products, self-perceived changes in symptoms and change in medications (at follow-up, variable duration). Cannabis products were categorized as cannabidiol (CBD) only, tetrahydocannabinol (THC) only or mixed CBD/THC. Of the mixed, formulations could be in 1:1 ratios (CBD+/THC+), predominantly CBD (CBD+/THC-) or predominantly THC (CBD-/THC+). Result(s): In total, 9766 subjects in the older cohort (65+ years old) completed the entire questionnaire (mean age (SD) = 73.6 (6.8) y, 60% female). They represented 23.1% of the total dataset (N = 42,267, mean (SD) =51.5 (16.8) y). The proportion of adults in the older cohort tended to increase over time (pre-2018: 17.6%;2018: 26.7%;2019: 31.2%;2020: 22.7%, when the overall intake decreased from 8869 to 5644). Among the older cohort, 15.5% were previous cannabis users and 67.7% were referred for chronic pain (mainly arthritis, chronic pain, lower back pain). Concomitant analgesic use was common (over-the-counter analgesics: 44.5%;opioids: 28.3%;NSAIDs: 24.5%). 7.9% of the sample (compared to 19.9% in the whole sample) were referred for psychiatric disorders, though 21.4% indicated antidepressant use and 12.3% indicated benzodiazepine use. Another 7% were referred for neurological disorders. Follow-up data were captured in visits (11,992) from 4698 older patients, averaging 2.5 visits per patient. The type of medical cannabis used changed over time, with increasing use of cannabis oil compared to herbal cannabis. In 2020, of 2478 visits, 78.9% use was cannabis oil and 6.7% was herbal forms (pre-2018: 57.6% vs 36.2%). The composition of cannabis oil demonstrated a preference for cannabinoid oil (CBD+) over tetrahydrocannabinol (THC+) in 6043 visits: 45.2% were using CBD+ preparations, only 3.2% were using THC+ preparations, and for CBD/THC combinations, CBD predominated (CBD+/THC-: 30.5%;CBD+/THC+: 16.8%;CBD-/THC+: 4.3%). Adverse-effects (7062 visits) included dry mouth (15.8%), drowsiness (8.6%), dizziness (4%) and hallucinations (0.6%). Patients reported improved pain, sleep and mood over time, though 15-20% reported no improvement or worsening. Medication use was mostly unchanged, though 40% of opioid users reported requiring reduced dosages. Conclusion(s): These data were drawn from a large convenience sample. The data suggest an increasing proportion of older users of medical cannabis, though COVID-19 may have affected recent use. Female users comprised a higher proportion, and cannabis oil containing CBD was preferred. Systematic studies of effectiveness and safety in older users of cannabinoids are needed given its increasing use. Funding(s): No funding was received for this work.Copyright © 2021
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Urine drug testing has been the standard for monitoring opioid compliance in chronic pain patients. The COVID-19 pandemic created a dilemma for opioid monitoring by severely limiting in-person testing due to safety concerns. Oral fluid toxicology emerged as a feasible, alternative test due to its ability for remote sample collection under virtual supervision while minimizing infringements on patient privacy. However, the efficacy of these two tests for reliably detecting opioids should be explored prior to transitioning to testing only with oral fluids. Method(s): In this study, we compared morphine levels in oral fluid and urine toxicology studies from 5 randomly selected patients from a Chronic Pain Center who were regularly taking high doses (>=90 mEq) of extended-release morphine. Charts from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic until July 2022 were reviewed for urine and oral fluid testing results and medication regimens. All oral fluid and urine test results and collection methods were validated by a nationally recognized toxicology lab. Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP) reports were reviewed for each patient to observe pre-testing prescription trends. Result(s): We found that the overwhelming majority of patients had at least 1 false negative oral fluid test result. The remainder of the oral fluid results were below threshold (10 ng/mL) or ranged from 11.3 to 54 ng/mL of morphine. 80% of patients (n = 5) had at least one negative or positive-but-below-threshold (10 ng/mL) result in their oral fluid sample analyses. In contrast, none of the urine studies had negative results. Urine studies for all patients were positive for morphine and well-above primary cutoff values (100 ng/mL) with levels >6000 ng/mL. PMP reports did not reveal any aberrant drug taking behavior in any of the patients. No unprescribed medications or illicit substances were detected in any of the oral or urine samples. Conclusion(s): The prevalence of false negative results for the detection of morphine metabolites in oral fluid toxicology may be higher than clinicians are currently aware of. Physicians and other providers monitoring opioid compliance in chronic pain patients should keep this possibility in mind when selecting toxicology tests and making conclusions about aberrant drug-taking behavior. Larger scale studies are needed to compare oral fluid and urine levels of morphine with extension to other commonly prescribed opioids. Disclosure: Evan Chung, MD: None, Joseph Valenza, MD: NoneCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 96 papers. The topics discussed include: practical pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder in the age of fentanyl;can COVID-19 cause acute psychosis in pediatric patients? a case report;a survey of bullying experiences in a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic population;acute emergence of suicidal thoughts following Lemborexant initiation: an adverse reaction case report;assessing the unmet clinical need and opportunity for digital therapeutic intervention in schizophrenia: perspective from people with schizophrenia;rapid antidepressant effects and MADRS item improvements with AXS-05 (DEXTROMETHORPHAN-BUPROPION), an oral NMDA receptor antagonist in major depressive disorder: results from two randomized double-blind, controlled trials;targeting lncRNA NEAT1 impedes Alzheimers disease progression via MicroRNA-193a mediated CREB/BDNF and NRF2/NQO1 pathways;and impact of AXS-05 (DEXTROMETHORPHAN-BUPROPION), an Oral NMDA receptor antagonist, on Anhedonic symptoms in major depressive disorder.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are some of the most common indications for prescribed opioids. It is unclear how opioid prescribing has changed in the UK for RMDs, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited healthcare access and cancelled elective-surgical interventions, which could impact prescribing in either direction. We aimed to investigate trends in opioid prescribing in RMDs and assess the impact of the pandemic in the UK. Methods Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia with opioid prescriptions between 01/Jan/2006-31/Aug/2021 without prior cancer in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) were included. We calculated ageand gender-standardised yearly rates of people with opioid prescriptions between 2006-2021, and identified change points in trends by checking whether the rate of change of standardised rates crossed zero. For people with opioid prescriptions, monthly measures of mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day were calculated between 2006-2021. To assess the impact of the pandemic, we fitted regression models to the monthly number of people with opioid prescriptions between Jan/2015-Aug/2021. The time coefficient reflects the trend pre-pandemic and the interaction term coefficient represents the change in the trend during the pandemic. Results We included 1,313,519 patients: 36,932 with RA, 12,649 with PsA, 6,811 with AxSpA, 6,423 with SLE, 1,255,999 with OA, and 66,944 with fibromyalgia. People with opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2018 for OA, to 2019 for RA, AxSpA and SLE, to 2020 for PsA, and to 2021 for fibromyalgia, and all plateaued/decreased afterwards. OA patients on opioids increased from 466.8/10,000 persons in 2006 to a peak of 703.0 in 2018, followed by a decline to 575.3 in 2021. From 2006 to 2021, there was a 4.5-fold increase in fibromyalgia opioid users (17.7 vs.78.5/10,000 persons). In this period, MME/day increased for all RMDs, with the highest for fibromyalgia (>=35). During COVID-19 lockdowns, RA, PsA and fibromyalgia showed significant changes in the trend of people with opioid prescriptions. With a decreasing trend for RA (-0.001,95%CI=-0.002,-0.001) and a decreasing-to-flat curve for PsA (0.0010,95%CI=0.0006,0.0015) prepandemic until Feb/2020, the trends changed by -0.005 (95%CI=-0.008,-0.002) for RA and -0.003 (95%CI=-0.006,-0.0003) for PsA, leading to steeper decreasing trends during the pandemic (Mar/2020-Aug/2021). Fibromyalgia, conversely, had an increasing trend (0.009,95%CI=0.008,0.009) pre-pandemic, and this trend started decreasing by -0.009 (95%CI=-0.011,-0.006) during the pandemic. Conclusion The plateauing/decreasing trend of people with opioid prescriptions in RMDs after 2018 may reflect the efforts to tackle the rising opioid prescribing in UK primary care. Of all RMDs, fibromyalgia patients had the highest MME/day throughout the study period. COVID-19 lockdowns contribute to fewer people on opioids for most RMDs, reassuring there was no sudden increase in opioid prescribing during the pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background: To reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), many substance use disorder treatment programs have transitioned to telemedicine. Emergency regulatory changes allow buprenorphine initiation without an in-person visit. We describe the use of videoconferencing for buprenorphine initiation combined with street outreach to engage 2 patients experiencing homelessness with severe opioid use disorder (OUD). Case Presentation: Patient 1 was a 30-year-old man with severe OUD who had relapsed to injection heroin/fentanyl after incarceration. A community drop-in center outreach harm reduction specialist facilitated a videoconference with an addiction specialist at an OUD bridge clinic. The patient completed a community buprenorphine/naloxone initiation and self-titrated to his prior dose, 8/2 mg twice daily. One week later, he reconnected with the outreach team for a follow-up videoconference visit. Patient 2, a 36-year-old man with severe OUD, connected to the addiction specialist via a syringe service program harm reduction specialist. He had been trying to connect to a community buprenorphine/naloxone provider, but access was limited due to COVID-19, so he was using diverted buprenorphine/naloxone to reduce opioid use. He was restarted on his previous dose of 12/3 mg daily which was continued via phone follow-up 16 days later. Conclusion(s): COVID-19-related regulatory changes allow buprenorphine initiation via telemedicine. We describe 2 cases where telemedicine was combined with street outreach to connect patients experiencing homelessness with OUD to treatment. These cases highlight an important opportunity to provide access to life-saving OUD treatment for vulnerable patients in the setting of a pandemic that mandates reduced face-to-face clinical interactions.Copyright © 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Many EP procedures are moving from the hospital to the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) outpatient setting. The COVID-19 pandemic and the CMS Hospitals Without Walls (HWW) program has been an impetus in accelerating this transition. Anesthesia provider perioperative management is critical in facilitating safe procedures with rapid, same-day discharge. Our EP-dedicated 2-OR ASC completed more than 3,000 procedures and more than 500 left-sided ablations utilizing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation with same-day discharge. To our knowledge, this experience is unique within an ASC setting in both volume and complexity. Objective(s): We present our comprehensive anesthesia strategy and lessons learned to facilitate safe, efficient procedures and discharge in an EP ASC. Method(s): A nurse anesthesiologist with more than a decade of EP-dedicated experience developed and taught a perioperative anesthesia strategy to facilitate high volume, safe and quick discharge care. Fundamental to this is the avoidance of opioids and benzodiazepines whenever possible. Propofol or general anesthesia with sevoflurane and complete reversal with sugammadex allow for quick recovery. Mandatory video laryngoscope utilization minimizes airway trauma, while liberal antiemetic use eliminates most nausea. All femoral access is device closed. Positive inotropes are used liberally during anesthetic to avoid heart failure. The goal is to deliver all patients to PACU on room air with stable hemodynamics. Anesthesia providers manage the preop and recovery area. Result(s): More than 90% of all patients undergoing general anesthesia and heparinization for left-atrial ablation were discharged home in under 3 hours. Nearly all procedures not requiring femoral access were discharged within 30-60 minutes. High procedure volumes with efficiencies far exceeding our in-hospital experience were thus facilitated with improved patient safety. Since HWW began, five patients have required transfer to the hospital without any deaths. All others were discharged same day. Conclusion(s): We suggest that a dedicated anesthesia team with a tailored perioperative anesthesia plan facilitates performing nearly all EP-related surgical procedures in an ASC. This success is facilitated by appropriate patient selection, preoperative evaluation, intraoperative care prioritizing quick return to baseline, and end-to-end anesthesia perioperative management. We believe this type of anesthesia management is critical to the transition of EP procedures to ASCs.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
In 1990, the seroprevalence of antibody against hepatitis C virus (anti- HCV) in Taiwan was first documented to be 0.95% in volunteer blood donors, 90% in hemophiliacs, and 81% in parenteral drug abusers. The risk factors for HCV infection in Taiwan include iatrogenic transmission (medical injection, hemodialysis, acupuncture, and blood transfusion), tattooing, and sexual transmission. The long-term risk of hepatic and non-hepatic diseases has been well-documented by REVEL-HCV study. A national program of antiviral therapy for chronic viral hepatitis was launched in Taiwan in 2003. Mortality rates of end-stage liver diseases decreased continuously from 2000-2003 to 2008-2011 in all age and gender groups. When the World Health Assembly adopted the Global Health Sector Strategy on Viral Hepatitis in 2016, National program to eliminate hepatitis C was very carefully evaluated. It became a consensus to reach the WHO's 2030 goals in 2025. Taiwan Hepatitis C Policy Guideline 2018-2025 was approved and published at the beginning of 2019. There are triple focuses of hepatitis C elimination in Taiwan including (1) therapy spearheads prevention, (2) screening supports therapy, and (3) prevention secures outcome. A total of US$1.7 billion will be allocated from 2017 to 2025 for the elimination of HCV. The coverage of HCV screening and treatment has been increasing significantly since 2017. The HCV screening coverage was almost 100% for dialytic patients, 96% for HIV-infected patients, 65% for patients under opioid substitution treatment, 63% for patients in the pre-end-stage renal disease care program, 57% for patients in the early chronic kidney disease care program, 52% for patients in diabetes care program, 39% for prisoners, and 38% for adults aged 45-79 years old in the general population by April 30, 2020. The budget to cover the cost of DAA increased from US$101 million in 2017 to US$219 million in 2019. The number of chronic hepatitis C patients receiving DAA therapy increased from 9,538 in 2017, 19,549 in 2018, to 45,806 in 2019. However, the number of DAA-treated CHC patients reduced to 36,159 in 2020 and 20,559 in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The cure rate based on SVR12 was 96.8% in 2017, 97.4% in 2018, over 98.6% after 2019. It is expected that Taiwan will achieve WHO's HCV elimination goal by 2025.
ABSTRACT
Background: The National HIV Mortality Review (NHMR) was launched by UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and British HIV Association to better recognise causes of death and preventable death, and to describe end-of-life care, among people with HIV. Method(s): UK HIV services submitted data on all known deaths among people with HIV under their care in 2021 through a secure online form. Cause of death was categorised by an epidemiologist and four clinicians using the Coding Causes of Death in HIV protocol. Result(s): In 2021, 101 services reported 606 deaths among people with HIV to NHMR. In 2019, 74 services reported to the NHMR while 121 reported in 2020. Median age at death was 58 [interquartile range (IQR): 56-59] and most (76%) were male. Death cause was ascertainable for 78% (n=475), with the most common being non-AIDS-related cancers (26%), followed by non-AIDS-defining infections (19%), cardiovascular disease (16%), AIDS (9%), substance misuse (8%), respiratory disease (4%), accident/suicide (3%), liver disease (2%) and other causes (11%). COVID- 19 caused or contributed to 11% of all deaths. Thirtythree people (5%) died within a year of HIV diagnosis, 90% of these were diagnosed late (CD4<350 cells/mm3), 80% very late (CD4<200 cells/mm3), 54% diagnosed with AIDS and 33% had documented missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis. Viral suppression (<200 copies/mL) (87%) and treatment coverage (98%) was high with the median time on treatment 13 years [IQR: 8-20]. Common lifestyle risk factors in the preceding year included smoking (33%;n=179), excessive alcohol use (20%;n=103). Other factors included drug use (non-injecting and injecting) and opioid substitution therapy. Death had been expected for 298 (49%) individuals, of whom 230 had discussed end-of-life care and 108 had a documented advanced end-of-life care plan in place. Conclusion(s): Over half of people living with diagnosed HIV are aged over 50. Most deaths were not AIDS related however, one in eleven people with diagnosed HIV in the UK died from AIDS. Of people that died within a year of diagnosis, one in three had documented missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Research demonstrates the benefits of robotic-assisted prostatectomies (RARP) in regard to blood loss and post-operative recovery, there is a paucity in the literature regarding RARP as an outpatient procedure. With minimal operating room capacity during COVID-19, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques and a relatively healthy patient population, outpatient RARP may be feasible. The aim of our study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of RARP as a same day outpatient procedure. METHOD(S): A retrospective cohort study at a single institution was performed by four fellowship trained surgeons who routinely perform RARP. Patients were identified through billing records who underwent RARP between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two cohorts, inpatient (one stay past midnight) and outpatient (defined as same day surgery with no stay past midnight). Individual surgeons admission necessity during COVID-19 limitations. We then extracted data using the electronic health record (EHR). The two groups were then compared using standard statistical methods for cohort studies. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. RESULT(S): Over a two-year period, a total of 497 RARP were performed with 139 (28%) outpatient cases. There was no difference in baseline demographics between the cohorts. There was a statistically significant difference in estimated blood loss (142 vs 102 mLs, p>=0.001) and operative time (193 vs 180 mins, p=0.004) in the inpatient vs outpatient cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in cancer stage, prostate size, or node/margin positivity between cohorts. There was a higher rate of readmissions (5% vs 0%, p=0.007) and number of ED presentations (0.15 vs 0.05, p=0.019) in the inpatient group. There was no difference in complication rates between the groups. Importantly, there was no significant difference in burden on the clinical staff demonstrated by no difference in number of phone calls to clinic, number of EHR messages, or opioid prescriptions on discharge. CONCLUSION(S): Overall, our data suggests that in a well selected patient group, RARP can safely be performed as an outpatient procedure with no significant differences on clinic staff workload or oncologic outcomes. While there was no pre-defined "algorithm" to determine outpatient vs inpatient surgery, the similarity in demographics and pre-operative characteristics between the groups lends support to performing this procedure as an outpatient with inpatient admission being reserved for select patients.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 health crisis joined, rather than supplanted, the opioid crisis as the most acutely pressing threats to US public health. In the setting of COVID-19, opioid use disorder treatment paradigms are being disrupted, including the fact that methadone clinics are scrambling to give "take-home"doses where they would typically not. The rapid transition away from in-person examination, dosing and group therapy in an era of social isolation calls for adjustments to clinical practice, including emphasizing patient-provider communication, favoring new inductees on buprenorphine and leveraging technology to optimize safety of medication treatment. Copyright © 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study Lewis County is in southwest Washington state. With a population per square mile of 31.4, Lewis County is more rural than the rest of the state (101.2 per square mile). Citizens of the county, as well as health care workers at Chehalis Family Medicine (located in Lewis County), report concerns over rates of opioid use disorder. While Lewis County's age adjusted rate per 100,000 of deaths due to opioid overdose from 2014-2017 was lower than that of Washington state (7.6 vs 9.3), its rate of opioid related hospitalizations was significantly higher (110.7 vs 81.5). Methods Used An asset-based approach was used to learn how Lewis County has been addressing opioid use disorder amongst its citizens. Interviews with health care providers, patients at Chehalis Family Medicine, and the pastor of a local church were performed. These conversations revealed a lack of access to public transportation creates a major barrier to receiving opioid use disorder treatment. A literature review of interventions implemented in rural areas to deliver medically assisted opioid use disorder treatment was performed. Summary of Results The recent use of telemedicine to deliver suboxone treatment at Chehalis Family Medicine has increased access to medically assisted treatment of opioid use disorder. Telemedicine has become more prevalent with some loosening of governmental regulations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Based upon articles by Guille et al and Weintraub et al, administration of medically assisted opioid use disorder treatment via telehealth offers a means to expand access to care in rural communities. They demonstrated no significant differences in patient outcomes. Implementation of telemedicine at other suboxone clinics in Lewis County would improve access to suboxone treatment. Conclusions A strength-based framework allows the existing assets in Lewis County to be appraised so future work can build upon what has already proved effective for the community. Regarding opioid use disorder treatment, Lewis county has several low barrier suboxone clinics which could increase access for rural patients through implementation of telemedicine. Chehalis Family Medicine's recent success with telemedicine in suboxone treatment could serve as a template for how to do so effectively.
ABSTRACT
Background: Saskatchewan, a Canadian Prairie province, faces a complicated HIV epidemic characterized by high rates of transmission due to injection drug use (IDU) and disproportionate representation of younger persons, women, and persons of Indigenous ethnicity. HIV incidence in Saskatchewan in 2021 was 19.7 per 100,000, 4.5 times higher than the Canadian average. Concurrently, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the recreational use of synthetic opioids such as fentanyl increased, leading to high numbers of overdose events & deaths. We characterized the difference in cascade of care outcomes & mortality amongst people with HIV (PWH) living in southern Saskatchewan during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective cohort study for all PWH cared for in the Infectious Diseases Clinic (IDC) at Regina General Hospital between December 31/19 and June 10/22. Age, sex, ethnicity & primary mode of HIV acquisition were collected from the IDC database, along with cascade of care & mortality data. Deaths, including most likely cause of death were characterized via individualized case review. Result(s): On December 31/19, IDC cared for 518 PWH. This increased to 585 by June 10/22. Amongst the current cohort, 245 (42%) were female, 163 (28%) were <= 35 years old, 306 (52%) were Indigenous, and 318 (54%) had acquired HIV through IDU. Cascade of care indicators worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. 58.1% of the cohort were retained in care & 76.1% virally suppressed (HIV RNA <= 200 copies/mL) in December 2019, decreasing to 51.3% retained (p=0.02) & 68.8% suppressed (p=0.06) by June 2022. There were 80 deaths during the study period, representing 15.4% of the cohort from the end of 2019. Most deaths (49, 61.3%) were due to suspected or confirmed drug overdose. 10 (12.5%) additional deaths occurred due to complications from IDU (i.e., sepsis). No deaths were directly attributable to COVID-19. Most who died acquired HIV from IDU (69/80, 86%). Conclusion(s): We describe intersecting epidemics of HIV and IDU disproportionately affecting high-risk populations, leading to significant morbidity & mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributing factors may have included disruption of safe opioid supply and disrupted access to harm reduction services due to COVID-19. Comprehensive population-level harm reduction and addictions management strategies are urgently needed to reduce morbidity & mortality from drug use amongst PWH in Saskatchewan.
ABSTRACT
The United States is currently in the midst of 2 public health emergencies: COVID-19 and the ongoing opioid crisis. In an attempt to reduce preventable harm to individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), federal, state, and local governments have temporarily modified law and policy to increase access to OUD treatment and divert some individuals at high risk away from the correctional system. In this Commentary, we briefly describe how people with OUD are at increased risk for COVID-19, discuss existing policy barriers to evidence-based prevention and treatment for individuals with OUD, explain the temporary rollbacks of those barriers, and argue that these changes should be made permanent. We also suggest several additional steps that federal and state governments can urgently take to reduce barriers to care for individuals with OUD, both during the current crisis and beyond. Copyright © 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The aim of our study is to evaluate the relationship between dexmedetomidine (DEX) use as a sedative agent in mechanical ventilated ICU patients and 28-day mortality. DEX, a selective alfa-2 adrenergic receptor agonist, widely used for its sedative and analgesic properties, has been linked to increasing parasympathetic tone, reducing the inflammatory response and oxidative stress [1]. Since severe COVID-19 is associated with an hyperinflammatory state, it is hypothesized that DEX might improve outcomes in these patients. Method(s): This is a retrospective observational study of mechanically ventilated patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia in the ICU of a tertiary center in Portugal, between March 2020 and December 2021. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of DEX use and 28-day mortality from time of intubation. Result(s): A total of 277 patients were analyzed, 151 in the DEX group and 126 in the no DEX group. Patients in the DEX group were younger (53.3 vs. 63.3 years, p < 0.001), had less comorbidities (2.8 vs. 3.5, p = 0.01), lower SOFA at admission (6.2 vs. 7.1, p = 0.01) but had a prolonged ICU stay (21.4 vs. 15.9, p < 0.001). Male gender (65.6 vs. 69.0, p = 0.54), incidence of obesity (56.3 vs. 46.8, p = 0.12), coronary artery disease (4.0 vs. 7.9, p = 0.16) and atrial fibrillation (4.0 vs. 7.1, p = 0.25) were similar between groups. PaO2/ FiO2 ratio at admission (111.1 vs. 108.1, p = 0.61), days spent in RASS < 3 (13.7 vs. 12.4, p = 0.31) and opioid use (14.8 vs. 13.1, p = 0.16) were also similar. From time of intubation, 28-day mortality in the cohort receiving DEX was 14.7% compared to 59.5% in the no DEX group (OR 0.12;95% CI 0.07-0.21;p = 0.01). Conclusion(s): Use of DEX was associated with lower 28-day mortality in COVID-19 critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation in our study analysis. Considering the limitations of a retrospective observational study, RCTs are needed to confirm the results.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Adverse drug reactions increase morbidity and mortality, prolong hospital stay and increase healthcare costs. The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of emergency department visits for adverse drug reactions and to describe their characteristics. The secondary objective was to determine the predictor variables of hospitalization for adverse drug reactions associated with emergency department visits. Method(s): Observational and retrospective study of adverse drug reactions registered in an emergency department, carried out from November 15th to December 15th, 2021. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the drugs involved and the adverse drug reactions were described. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors related to hospitalization for adverse drug reactions. Result(s): 10,799 patients visited the emergency department and 216 (2%) patients with adverse drug reactions were included. The mean age was 70 +/- 17.5 (18-98) years and 47.7% of the patients were male. A total of 54.6% of patients required hospitalization and 1.6% died from adverse drug reactions. The total number of drugs involved was 315 with 149 different drugs. The pharmacological group corresponding to the nervous system constituted the most representative group (n = 81). High-risk medications, such as antithrombotic agents (n = 53), were the subgroup of medications that caused the most emergency department visits and hospitalization. Acenocumarol (n = 20) was the main drug involved. Gastrointestinal (n = 62) disorders were the most common. Diarrhea (n = 16) was the most frequent adverse drug reaction, while gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 13) caused the highest number of hospitalizations. Charlson comorbidity index behaved as an independent risk factor for hospitalization (aOR 3.24, 95% CI: 1.47-7.13, p = 0.003, in Charlson comorbidity index 4-6;and aOR 20.07, 95% CI: 6.87-58.64, p = 0.000, in Charlson comorbidity index >= 10). Conclusion(s): The prevalence of emergency department visits for adverse drug reactions continues to be a non-negligible health problem. High-risk drugs such as antithrombotic agents were the main therapeutic subgroup involved. Charlson comorbidity index was an independent factor in hospitalization, while gastrointestinal bleeding was the adverse drug reaction with the highest number of hospital admissions.Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Espanola de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H)
ABSTRACT
Introduction & Objectives: Since COVID-19 global pandemic started, increasing importance was given to same-day discharge (SDD) protocols to minimize viral exposure, reducing healthcare costs without compromising patients' safety. While SDD protocols have been applied for robotic radical prostatectomy, literature is still lacking studies evaluating the feasibility of meeting SSD criteria for patients who underwent RASP. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of hospital discharge 24h after surgery. Our secondary endpoint was to assess predictors of successful discharge on 1st postoperative day (POD). Material(s) and Method(s): Patients with allergy to local anesthetics, those scheduled for concomitant surgical procedures and those with severe comorbidities (ASA score 3-4) were excluded from the analysis. Outcomes of this study were: Postoperative Hb drop, 30-day post-surgical readmission, any post-discharge complication, postoperative, time to flatus and consequent regular diet restoration, PSA, flowmetry parameters and validated questionnaires. The SDD criteria included: stable postoperative hemoglobin and vital signs, tolerance of clear liquids, pain control with oral medications and no perioperative complications requiring a prolonged hospitalization (Clavien >1). Result(s): Demographics and baseline values of 63 consecutive patients were reported in Table 1. Perioperative outcomes were shown in table 2. No perioperative complications were reported, median DELTAHb was 2.2 mg/dl, vital signs were stable for every patient. Overall, 55 (87%) patients passed flatus within 24 hours from surgery, and regular diet was restored;7 patients (11%) needed opioids for pain control. Two thirds of patients (n=42, 67%) met the criteria for SDD. At logistic regression analysis, patient's age was the only independent predictor of one night stay (OR 0.89;95% CI 0.80 - 0.98 p=0.02;Table 3). Patients younger than 60 met 24 hours discharge criteria in 90%, while those older than 70 in 50% of cases. Conclusion(s): In a selected cohort of patients with negligible comorbidities profile, discharge within 24h from RASP seems a safe and feasible option in 67% of cases. Patient' age was the only predictor of successful 1 night stay after RASP in our series. [Table presented]Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.